Heat recovery is one of the most effective and economic levers to improve the energy efficiency of industrial processes.
Often more than half of the total energy consumption is used for heating and cooling. Recovering this energy directly within the process reduces operating costs, lowers CO₂ emissions and improves overall sustainability performance.
At the same time, regulatory requirements and reporting obligations are increasing, making a structured and economically sound heat recovery concept more important than ever.
Our heat recovery (Pinch) analysis approach is a systematic method to identify the technically and economically optimal heat recovery and utility concept for industrial processes, typically reducing thermal energy demand by 10–40%, often resulting in significant energy cost savings attractive payback times of 1–4 years.
A structured heat recovery pinch analysis provides:
Prioritisation of technically feasible measures
An investment-optimized concept considering CAPEX, OPEX and payback time
A sound basis for decarbonisation and utility system optimization
Unlike isolated measures, pinch analysis evaluates the entire process energy system to avoid sub-optimal or conflicting solutions.
Collect the process streams: We list all process steps that need heating (cold streams) and those that release waste heat / need cooling (hot streams), including inlet/outlet temperature and heat load. During this step we also challenge requirements (e.g., “do we really need this temperature?”), which often reveals quick wins.
Create the composite curves: All hot streams are combined into the Hot Composite Curve, and all cold streams into the Cold Composite Curve. The curves are a condensed “energy picture” of the whole plant across temperature levels.
Identify the theoretical heat recovery potential: The overlap between both curves shows how much heat could be recovered internally in theory (HR Pot.). From the same diagram we also derive the minimum remaining Hot Utility (HU) and Cold Utility (CU) needed from external supply.
Find the best ΔTmin (CAPEX vs. OPEX): Heat recovery depends on the minimum temperature difference ΔTmin: a smaller ΔTmin increases the heat recovery and reduces energy cost, but requires larger heat exchanger area (higher investment). We evaluate this trade-off to select an economically reasonable ΔTmin.
Turn theory into a practical concept: The potential heat recovery HR Pot. provides the benchmark; next we translate it into a realistic concept considering layout, operability and economics. The result is a prioritised set of measures, including heat exchanger network improvements and—where useful—heat pumps or CHP to upgrade low-temperature waste heat.

Management-Summary: a Pinch Analysis...
Shows how much heat can optimally be recovered
Balances investment cost vs. energy savings
Defines minimum heating and cooling needs
The key question is not whether heat recovery is possible, but how much potential exists and which level of analysis is needed to identify the optimal integration. A structured approach is essential: implementing local heat recovery measures without understanding the overall system often leads to sub-optimal results and missed potential.
Offered heat recovery analysis and implementation services:
Based on our experience, we usually recommend the following procedure:
1. Screening → 2. Full Pinch → 3. Rollout → 4. Implementation
Starting with the Rough Heat Recovery Screening, these essential questions are answered:
Does the process have relevant heat recovery potential? How large is it approximately? And is the system complexity high enough to justify a full pinch analysis—or is the situation already clear enough to directly design selected heat recovery solutions?
In some cases, where the heat recovery potential and the complexity of the plant is evident enough, also a direct start into a Full Heat Recovery Pinch Analysis can make sense and the overall analysis duration and the consulting cost can slightly be reduced. In most cases however, staring with Rough Heat Recovery Screening does not relevantly increase total cost and time but enables minimal upfront effort.
Start with a Rough Heat Recovery Screening if:
you want a fast, structured overview of where heat is used and wasted
you need an order-of-magnitude estimate of heat recovery and CO₂ reduction potential
you want a clear recommendation for next steps: full pinch analysis vs. direct design of selected measures
you want to align internal stakeholders before going into a detailed study
Typical outcome:
Go / No-Go decision for a full pinch analysis or direct concept design of selected heat recovery measures.
Typical cost range:
EUR / USD / CHF: 5’000 – 20’000+
A Full Heat Recovery Pinch Analysis is recommended if:
you want an investment-optimized site-wide concept (CAPEX vs. OPEX trade-off)
the site has several heating and cooling tasks across different temperature levels
you are interested in potential heat pump / CHP / utility integration as part of the concept
you need a prioritised measure package with economic evaluation for implementation planning
Typical outcome:
A detailed, prioritized heat recovery and utility concept with economic evaluation and an implementation roadmap.
Typical cost range:
EUR / USD / CHF: 30’000 – 100’000+
Important note:
The actual effort depends on site complexity, number of relevant process streams, data availability and batch vs. continuous operation. An initial Rough Heat Recovery Screening often helps to define the optimal level of analysis with minimal upfront effort. The consulting work performed within a Rough Heat Recovery Study is not lost when subsequently starting a Full Pinch Analysis. Most often, the findings and investigations of the Rough Heat Recovery Screening build an optimal foundation and starting point for a Full Heat Recovery Pinch Study and usually enables us to reduce the cost of the latter.
A rough heat recovery pinch analysis is a fast screening to identify major energy consumers, waste heat sources and the overall heat recovery potential of a plant.
Within a rough heat recovery screening, the main energy consumers are identified and the energy saving potential as well as the reduction potential of CO2 emissions are roughly estimated. Waste heat sources are listed and approaches for energy recovery are developed. As a result, recommendations for further actions will be worked out: e.g. if a detailed Full Heat Recovery Pinch Analysis would make sense or to directly go on with implementing the proposed heat recovery systems.

A full pinch analysis provides a technically sound and economically optimised heat recovery and utility concept for industrial plants.

Complete analysis of process, plant and energy supply
Evaluation of heating and cooling tasks at different temperature levels
Integration of utilities (steam, hot water, heat pumps, CHP, etc.)
Interested in a structured heat recovery or pinch analysis for your site? Contact our experts to discuss scope, effort and expected benefits:
You have already elaborated a Pinch analysis on an existing plant and would like to apply the results to similar plant(s)? Then our pragmatic Adaption and Multi Site Rollout solution fits perfectly.
Many industrial groups operate multiple sites with similar processes. After an initial screening or full pinch analysis, we support the structured rollout of proven measures across sites—ensuring consistent targets, comparable business cases and a prioritised implementation roadmap.
Anytherm supports customers from concept to implementation—as a solution-independent heat recovery expert and, where suitable, also as a heat recuperator product partner for selected applications.
Anytherm provides solution- and product-independent consulting. For specific applications—especially exhaust air and flue gas heat recovery—we can also contribute in-depth practical know-how based on our own technical solutions. For other applications (e.g. liquid/liquid heat recovery), we typically support technology selection and supplier evaluation. In all cases, our consulting remains strictly solution- and product-neutral and focuses on the technically and economically optimal solution.
For implementation in existing or new plants, customers often work with EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) contractors. We support by ensuring that the findings of the heat recovery analysis are translated into a feasible, operable design and correctly implemented.
"The target is to operate a process at required throughput and product quality with minimum energy, resource requirements and emissions."
In industry, often more than half of the energy is used for heating and cooling processes. It is therefore important to analyze these processes more closely and optimize them in terms of energy consumption, (CO2) emissions, as well as investment and operating costs.
Classical energy optimization approaches focus on improving individual apparatuses or infrastructure facilities. Experience shows, however, that a greater overall increase in energy efficiency can usually be achieved by optimally linking energy flows in the overall system. To increase energy efficiency, heat recovery back into the process is essential.
The Pinch analysis systematically examines the entire system (process, production plant, and energy supply). Then, a technically feasible and economically optimized plant design is generated (considering investment and operating costs).
With the recommended measures, the energy requirements of industrial processes can usually be reduced by 10% to 40%. The payback period is tipically in the range of one to four years.
Pinch analysis is also a valuable tool when planning new systems/plants and processes ⇒ “First Time Right!"
Planning a new plant, a major retrofit or intereted about the benefits of an optimally integrated heat recovery system?
A systematic heat recovery pinch analysis helps to get the energy concept right from the start!
Anytherm: Advising in a Solution-Oriented, Competent and Neutral Manner